Georgia Criminal Law Blog

ATLANTA - A man who says he desperately needed to use an airplane bathroom after eating something bad in Honduras faces a federal charge after being accused of twisting a flight attendant’s arm to get to the lavatory, the FBI said Wednesday.

 Joao Correa, 43, told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution he had a bathroom emergency 30 minutes into a March 28 Delta Air Lines flight from Honduras to Atlanta, but found the single coach aisle on the Boeing 737 blocked by a beverage cart. He said he asked if he could use the lavatory in business class, but was told no.

 Transportation Security Administration policy requires passengers on international flights to use the restroom in their seating class.

 When the cart wasn’t moved after a few minutes, Correa said, he ran for the business class lavatory. He said the flight attendant put up her arm to block him, and he grabbed it to keep his balance.

 A Delta flight attendant said Correa grabbed her right arm, pulled it down and twisted it, according to authorities.

 The man was arrested after the plane landed in Atlanta after a three-hour flight and Correa was held for two days in jail, authorities said. He was charged with interference with a flight crew, said Gregory Jones, head of the FBI in Atlanta, and released on bond after appearing before a U.S. magistrate.

 ”I’m devastated,” the Concord, Ohio, man told the paper. “I’ve never had any event with the police in my life.”

 Correa could not be reached Wednesday by The Associated Press. A message was left on his home telephone.

 Delta spokeswoman Susan Elliott released a statement saying flight crews “do everything within the limits of the law to ensure the safety and security of our passengers.”

http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/atlanta/stories/2009/01/15/tesler_conviction_overturned.html?cxntlid=homepage_tab_newstab

Today Judge Jim Bodiford sentenced Brian Nichols to four life sentences without parole, seven life sentences plus 485 years all running consecutive to one another.  Brian Nichols will never see the outside world again.  The Judge suggested that the Feds house him at the Federal Supermax prison in Colorado, although he has been convicted of State crimes.

I don’t know if this is the last of the courtroom days that we will see for Brian Nichols, the Feds may still prosecute him and try for the death penalty again.  Hopefully, we can all be glad that this nightmare of a case is over for now.  It has single handedly nearly bankrupted the public defender system.  I should note that this is not the only cause of that problem, the legislature is mostly to blame for failing to appropriate all of the money collected from the public defender surcharge on criminal cases, but that is a topic for another day.

I am not rejoicing in Paul Howard’s office losing another high profile case.  I am not rejoicing that Brian Nichols did not get the death penalty.  There is a strong argument that he deserved the death penalty.  However, the last three death penalty verdicts handed out across the metro area, were all arguably more heinous than this case.  This was definitely a bad case, but it was an attention-getter because of who the victims were.  If he would have escaped and shot four homeless men, I doubt whether prosecutors would have sought the death penalty.

Today, I am worried about what will happen in the legislature next year.  Bad cases usually make bad law.  It will take some serious restraint for the legislature to not have a knee-jerk reaction to this case.  I would bet my house and my kids college fund that one of the first bills introduced next session is a non-unanimous death penalty bill.  A similar bill was defeated two sessions ago.  It is appropriate that a death verdict must be unanimous.

I also worry about the backlash that he three hold-out jurors will face.  They will face public scorn, ridicule and possibly threats of violence like they have never known their whole lives.

In the end, it was a huge waste of millions and millions of taxpayer dollars to try to kill Brian Nichols.  This case could have been resolved with a guilty plea and this sentence years ago.  I do also understand the prosecutor’s argument that if they don’t seek the death penalty on Brian Nichols, then how would they ever justify it on anyone else.

Maybe Judge Bodiford was right when he talked about how some people feel at sentencing.  “If only Agent Wilhelm would have gotten the draw on Mr. Nichols.”

The story from the AJC is printed below.  To me, it is ridiculous that this execution was scheduled the way it was.  The Supreme Court was scheduled to decide if they would hear the appeal from the Georgia Supreme Court (which was a 4-3 decision).  Instead of letting the appeal run its course, the powers that be in Georgia tried to beat the high court to the punch by hastily scheduling his execution prior to the high court’s decision on whether they would hear the appeal.  If you kill a police officer, sure you deserve the death penalty.  But before it’s given, let’s at least be sure that the man is guilty.  From what I have read about the case, there appears to be an abundance of reasonable doubt and if the case was tried again, he would most likely be acquitted.  The court’s have continued to give great defference to the original jury’s verdict, despite the recantations.  Read on.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday issued a stay of execution for Troy Anthony Davis less than two hours before he was to be put to death by lethal injection.

Davis’ family and supporters, who for years have pressed for a new trial on claims Davis is innocent, broke into tears and song when they learned the high court had at least temporarily postponed the execution.

Troy Davis received a stay of execution just before he was set to receive a lethal injection for the 1989 murder of a Savannah police officer.

“I’ve been praying for this moment forever,” said Davis’s sister and most outspoken proponent, Martina Correia. Davis’ mother, Virginia Davis, said God had answered their prayers.

Just a few hours earlier, the mother and sister had given Davis what they thought could be their final good-byes at the Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison in Jackson.

Davis, 39, sits on death row for the Aug. 19, 1989, killing of Savannah Police Officer Mark Allen MacPhail. He was scheduled to be executed at 7 p.m.

Annelie Reaves, MacPhail’s sister, said the victim’s family was furious but would wait for the execution to be rescheduled.

“It should have happened today,” she said, “but justice will be served.”

At least two members of MacPhail’s family were to witness the execution, and they will return when the execution is rescheduled, Reaves said.

In response to Davis’ hope that the real killer will be found, the officer’s family and friends all laughed. “He knows who the killer is,” Reaves said of Davis.

It was the second time that Davis, whose claims of innocence have attracted international attention, was granted a stay hours before he was to be put to death. In July 2007, the state Board of Pardons and Paroles postponed his execution less than 24 hours before it was to occur.

This time, the stay came from the nation’s highest court.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s justices are scheduled to meet Monday to decide whether to hear Davis’ appeal of a ruling issued by the Georgia Supreme Court in March. In that 4-3 decision, the state Supreme Court rejected Davis’ bid for a new trial or a court hearing to present new evidence.

In its order, the U.S. Supreme Court said if the justices decline to hear Davis’ case, “this stay shall terminate automatically.” If the court agrees to hear the case, the stay will remain in force until the high court issues its ultimate ruling, the order said.

The high court did not say when it would announce its decision whether to hear or deny Davis’ appeal.

Davis disclosed the news of his stay in a phone call to his sister and civil rights activist Rev. Al Sharpton.

“I truly feel blessed and I know we still have work to do,” Davis said, according to Sharpton. “With God, all things are possible.”

According to Sharpton, Davis said he had already recorded his last statement, as is customary for death-row inmates before they are to be executed. Davis said he had also prayed for the family of MacPhail, a 27-year-old father of two who was gunned down at a Savannah Burger King parking lot.

Because the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to announce whether it will hear the appeal in the next week or so, Davis may not be spared for long, Sharpton said.

“One week may not seem like a long time, but when you have only two hours to live it’s a lifetime,” he added.

Lester Davis, Troy Davis’ brother, said, “I’ve got to stay focused because it’s not over yet. Hopefully, this gives them enough time to understand the injustice of this case.”

Since his 1991 trial, seven of nine key prosecution witnesses who testified against Davis have recanted their testimony.

In March, a deeply divided state Supreme Court turned down Davis’ appeal, saying the recantations of seven witnesses who testified against him were not enough to win him a new trial or court hearing.

“We simply cannot disregard the jury’s verdict,” Justice Harold Melton wrote. The majority, he added, could not ignore the trial testimony, “and, in fact, we favor that original testimony over the new.”

Chief Justice Leah Ward Sears issued a strong dissent.

“If recantation testimony, either alone or supported by other evidence, shows convincingly that prior trial testimony was false, it simply defies all logic and morality to hold that it must be disregarded categorically,” she wrote.

The new testimony, if found credible, could lead a new jury to find reasonable doubt of Davis’ guilt or enough residual doubt to impose a sentence other than death, she wrote.

ATLANTA (AP) — A death row inmate who has drawn international headlines with claims that he is innocent of killing a Savannah police officer is scheduled to be executed later this month, Georgia authorities said Wednesday.Troy Davis, who is on death row for gunning down a Savannah police officer in 1989, is scheduled to die Sept. 23. Davis contends he should be granted a new trial after several witnesses who testified against him have recanted their statements.The execution order was signed by Georgia Attorney General Thurbert Baker six months after the Georgia Supreme Court narrowly denied his request for a new trial. An appeal has been filed to the U.S. Supreme Court, but the court is not scheduled to discuss the case until days after the impending execution.The state’s decision drew a sharp rebuke from Amnesty International, a human rights group that has worked to draw media and public attention to the case.”We’re shocked and appalled that the attorney general short-circuited justice by setting an execution before letting the Supreme Court weigh in,” said Jared Feuer, the group’s southern regional director.Davis was convicted of the 1989 murder of 27-year-old officer Mark MacPhail, who was working off-duty as a security guard at a bus station.MacPhail had rushed to help a homeless man who had been pistol-whipped at a nearby parking lot, and when he approached Davis and two other men, he was shot in the face and the chest.Witnesses identified Davis as the shooter. A jury convicted him in 1991 and sentenced him to death. At the trial, prosecutors said he wore a “smirk on his face” as he fired the gun, according to records.But Davis’ lawyers say new evidence could exonerate their client and prove that he was a victim of mistaken identity.Several witnesses who initially testified against Davis have since recanted or contradicted their testimony. And three others who did not testify have said another man, Sylvester “Red” Coles — who testified against Davis at the trial — confessed to the killing.Coles refused to talk about the case when contacted by The Associated Press during a 2007 Chatham County court appearance on an unrelated traffic charge, and he has no listed phone number.Prosecutors have called the witness statements “suspect,” and contended in court hearings the case is closed.They also say some of the witness affidavits simply repeat what a trial jury has already heard, while others are irrelevant because they come from witnesses who never testified.Davis was one day away from being put to death July 2007 when the state Board of Pardons and Paroles issued a stay of execution.The state’s top court rejected Davis’ appeal in March and a plea to reconsider the ruling in April by identical 4-3 votes. The Supreme Court is scheduled to discuss whether to hear the case at a Sept. 29 conference.The Attorney General’s office said the state does not need to wait for the Supreme Court to act, and that Davis has already completed “the regular appeal track.” Davis supporters, meanwhile, urge the Supreme Court to stay the execution until it can consider the case.”We would hope the U.S. Supreme Court would grant a stay to allow their decision to be issued,” said Feuer. “And I do have to say we are absolutely shocked that the attorney general would not allow legal avenues to be pursued.”

By David Von Drehle  (click here for link)

In 1990, Curtis Osborne, a small-time cocaine dealer and addict, killed
two people in a dispute over $400. His crime revulsed the town of
Griffin, Georgia, one measure of which was the bigoted remark a local
inmate reported hearing at the jail: “That little nigger deserves the
chair.”

As repulsive as the remark was on its own, far more disturbing was the
fact that the person alleged to have uttered it was Osborne’s own
court-appointed lawyer. And somehow, through years of appeals in state
and federal courts, no tribunal has squarely confronted this basic but
fundamental question: is a person on trial for his life entitled to a
lawyer who does not hold him in contempt and believe he should be executed.

Osborne is scheduled to be executed Wednesday. His last-ditch plea to
have his sentence commuted to life in prison was denied this morning by
the state Board of Pardons and Paroles, despite supportive letters from
Georgia luminaries including former President Jimmy Carter and former
deputy attorney general Larry Thompson — a Democrat and a Republican,
respectively.

His case is a vivid example of the way legal “technicalities” have
tipped the scales from favoring death row prisoners to favoring the
state. Georgia officials, after all, never had to try to prove that
Osborne’s lawyer was not a bigot, or even that his feelings about his
client shouldn’t matter one way or the other. Instead, they were the
beneficiaries of court rulings that said the issue was moot for
procedural reasons.

From the record of his case, Curtis Osborne was a numbskull junkie who
managed to sell his friend’s motorcycle for $400, then pocketed the
money. When the friend came after the cash, Osborne shot the man and his
girlfriend at close range. He later tried to explain the gunshot residue
on his hands by saying that he fed his dog doses of gunpowder, but the
authorities weren’t impressed. Osborne eventually cracked and confessed.

Soon after, the flamboyant Johnny Mostiler, a local lawyer known for his
abundant jewelry, handlebar moustache and overwhelming caseload, became
his attorney. In those days, Mostiler represented all the indigent
inmates in the county for a flat annual fee, hundreds and hundreds of
felony cases. His clients often filed into court shackled to one another
in rows to enter their guilty pleas, according to a profile in American
Prospect magazine. So suffice it to say that he didn’t have a lot of
time for Osborne.

Preparation for a first-rate capital defense can often take hundreds of
hours, including an extensive investigation of the accused’s childhood,
mental health, drug abuse history and so on. But the law does not
promise a first-rate defense. As a panel of judges from the 11th Circuit
Court of Appeals said in denying Osborne’s request for a new trial, “for
a petitioner to show deficient performance” by an attorney, “he must
establish that no competent counsel would have taken the action that his
counsel did take.” And how do you show that? “There are no absolute
rules,” the judges said vaguely.

So throughout Osborne’s legal odyssey state and federal judges combed
through his appeals in an effort to decide just how third-rate
Mostiler’s work actually was. Osborne argued that Mostiler should have
uncovered exculpatory evidence. The courts decided that the evidence
wasn’t exculpatory enough. Osborne’s lawyers said Mostiler should have
called experts to challenge the prosecution case. Courts decided that
experts would not have changed the outcome. Osborne challenged the
failure to conduct a robust examination of the role of mental illness
and addiction in his unraveling. The courts believed Mostiler’s
testimony that he never saw any evidence of drug abuse or illness.
Instead, Mostiler chose to argue to the jury that Osborne’s crimes were
not premeditated, an ultimately unsuccessful strategy that appeals
courts found to be nonetheless reasonable.

All in all, Osborne’s has been a fairly typical capital appeal, in which
the defense team heaps allegations on the original lawyer — the
high-living Mostiler died of a coronary in 2000 — while the prosecution
extols the brilliance of the condemned man’s trial attorney. “Mostiler
was the toughest trial lawyer in Spalding County,” one prosecutor
declared of a man far better known for engineering guilty pleas than for
winning cases in the courtroom.

Which leaves the alleged racist remarks and the attorney’s apparent
belief that his own client deserved to die.

Those words didn’t actually surface until years after they were
allegedly uttered, when another Mostiler client at the time of Osborne’s
trial reported the slur. He said Mostiler indicated that he wasn’t
planning to work very hard to save the killer and that he wasn’t telling
Osborne that the state was offering a plea bargain to life in prison.
The issue of the plea deal had already been raised in an earlier appeal
before the lawyer’s death, and when Mostiler testified that he conveyed
the state’s offer and Osborne turned it down, the appellate judges chose
to believe him over his former client.

It’s too late to ask him about the n-word in Osborne’s case — but this
is not the first time Mostiler has been accused of using the word to
describe a client. In another case, a defendant unsuccessfully tried to
get a new lawyer because Mostiler was calling him hateful names. When
the judge turned to the lawyer, Mostiler didn’t deny it. “I honestly
can’t say whether I said it or not. I don’t use those terms out in
public,” was as far as he would go.

But neither Mostiler nor the State of Georgia was ever pressed on the
matter. State courts ruled that Osborne waited too long to raise the
issue, and federal courts deferred to that decision. The 11th Circuit
panel closed the matter in dry and technical terms: “The state trial
court relied upon Georgia procedural rules in denying Osborne relief on
this claim. As such, the claim is barred from federal review.”

Of course, we are talking about a confessed killer of two people. Some
Americans believe that all such aggravated murders should be punished by
death. That’s not the law, however: in 1976, the Supreme Court ruled
that mandatory death sentences are unconstitutional. Instead, each
capital case must be individually scrutinized on its own merits.

But is this individual scrutiny possible when the prisoner’s attorney
slurs him and says he deserves to die? For Curtis Osborne, the ultimate
insult is that such a crucial question is barred from review.

On the heels of commuting Samuel David Crowe’s sentence to life without parole, the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles is being asked to spare another defendant’s life. Curtis Osborne has an execution date of June 4, 2008. Among his claims are the allegation that his court appointed lawyer,  Johnny Mostiler,was a racist that did not convey the plea offer of life in prison to Mr. Osborne. See the AJC article “Racism infected killer’s defense?”

Former President Jimmy Carter, former deputy U.S. Attorney General Larry Thompson and former Georgia Supreme Court Chief Justice Norman Fletcher are sending letters to the board requesting clemency for Osborne.

Fletcher, who voted in 1993 to uphold Osborne’s death sentence, said he recalled Mostiler’s “apparent ineptness” because he raised so few issues on appeal.

“As is now all too well apparent, it is Mr. Osborne who is suffering due to Mr. Mostiler’s grave shortcomings and his racial prejudices of perhaps a lifetime.”

For more information on the recent Crowe commutation click here.

Atlanta cop sentenced to 4½ years in prison
Associated Press

ATLANTA (AP) — A city police officer was sentenced Thursday to 4½ years in prison for lying to investigators about a botched drug raid that ended in the shooting death of a 92-year-old woman.Arthur Tesler, 42, was the only officer to face trial in the raid, which led to an outcry from civil rights activists and to a shake up of the police department. Tesler also was sentenced to serve six months of probation and 450 hours of community service.Kathryn Johnston died in a hail of police bullets after narcotics officers burst into her northwest Atlanta home the night of Nov. 21, 2006, using a special no-knock warrant to search for drugs.Testimony showed that Tesler was in Johnston’s back yard when other officers went in through the front door. Johnston fired a single shot at the intruders, and officers returned a volley of 39, striking her five or six times.Police originally said they had gone to the woman’s house after an informant bought drugs there. After searching the home and finding no drugs, the officers tried to cover up the mistake, planting three baggies of marijuana, prosecutors said.Tesler was convicted of making false statements, but was acquitted of two more serious charges, violating his oath of office and of false imprisonment under color of legal process.Tesler lied to support his partners’ claims that they had valid information for a search warrant, but he later admitted the truth to the FBI, said his lawyer, William J. McKenney.McKenney asked Johnson for the minimum one-year prison sentence, and called relatives and one of Tesler’s neighbors to vouch for his character and ask the judge to allow him to return soon to his wife and four children, ages 10 months to 13 years.The shackled Tesler blinked back tears as his wife, Kelli, expressed their remorse for the tragedy and described her husband as a good man and “a dad who has to regularly beat up monsters in the closet before bedtime.”The prosecutor, Kellie S. Hill, asked the judge to sentence Tesler to the maximum of five years in prison “to do what is just for Ms. Johnston.”Hill said Tesler could have told the truth at any time.”For those monsters that he can’t fight for his children, he can blame himself,” she said.Two others, Jason R. Smith and Gregg Junnier, have pleaded guilty to state manslaughter and federal civil rights charges. They have been helping investigators in other cases unrelated to Johnston’s death and have not yet been sentenced. Federal prosecutors are recommending 10 years and one month in prison for Junnier and 12 years and seven months for Smith.U.S. Attorney David Nahmias said in a statement that his office was waiting to determine if Tesler should face federal charges until the state case was decided. The government will determine “as expeditiously as possible” whether to pursue federal charges, Nahmias said.

Read the Yahoo.com article here.

This is from WSB.

DeKalb County police and many others want to see exactly what recording artist Kid Rock was doing at a local Waffle House restaurant.Police say musician Kid Rock was arrested after a brawl at the restaurant and spent about 12 hours in jail before being released on bond.Authorities say the musician stopped at the Waffle House restaurant shortly after 5 a.m. Sunday after his performance at The Tabernacle in Atlanta.Police said Rock and his entourage were finishing a meal when a male customer began exchanging words with a woman sitting with Rock. DeKalb County Police Department, Mekka Parish said it escalated to a physical fight between Kid Rock and the customer that moved outside to the parking lot. Police said 39-year-old Harlen Akins shattered a restaurant window during the fight. He was treated at the hospital.The fight was possibly caught on video tape. The restaurant manager’s girlfriend, Jennifer Carol, said, “Yes, I want to see it. New York Times already wants it.” Parish says Kid Rock left in his tour bus and was stopped by police about a mile from the restaurant. The musician and five members of his entourage were taken into custody on a misdemeanor charge of simple battery. The other customer was charged with criminal damage to property, a felony. Kid Rock was released from the county jail on bond about 5 p.m.Akins is also facing charges.

A U.S. Marine from the metropolitan Atlanta Area has been in our local news lately because he has been charged by the military with the murder in connection with a military operation in Iraq in which he was involved. He is currently at a Marine base in Hawaii where his court martial and related proceedings are being held. One recent news story related to what is called an “Article 32 Hearing.” As it’s name suggests, Article 32 hearings are held pursuant to Article 32 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and are a rough corollary to the Grand Jury process in state systems and the civilian federal system.

As a former U.S. Navy Judge Advocate and former Assistant District Attorney in Georgia, I have real world experience with both processes and felt like an article comparing and contrasting each would be appropriate and timely here.

Both the Article 32 hearing and the Grand Jury inquire are designed, in theory, to serve as a pre-trial determination of probable cause. Without getting too deep, the concept of “probable cause” is a term-of-art for legal professionals and cannot be easily described. Nonetheless, as I used to teach my students, “probable cause” is a level of proof or evidence that may lead a reasonable person to conclude that a crime probably has been committed and the accused probably committed it.

The 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states:
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

UCMJ Article 32(a) states as follows:
No charge or specification may be referred to a general court-martial for trial until a through and impartial investigation of all the matters set forth therein has been made. This investigation shall include inquiry as to the truth of the matter set forth in the charges, consideration of the form of charges, and recommendation as to the disposition which should be made of the case in the interest of justice and discipline.

Very different from each other, huh? On it’s face the 5th Amendment makes the right to grand jury review inapplicable to the military. So congress stepped in and filled that due process void with UCMJ Article 32.

I can say from my own personal experience that, in practice the two processes are very different from one another in real life as well. The Grand Jury hearing (in state practice) may last for less than 5 minutes in routine cases and the defendant is typically NOT present. In fact, the proceedings are secret and it is a crime to disclose anything said behind those closed doors. An Article 32 Hearing, however, can last for days and is wide open to the public and even the media in many instances. The accused participates with his or her attorney and gets to cross examine witnesses and is given access to documents and other items of evidence. A grand jury is not presided over by anyone (except the forperson who’s authority is quite limited). There is no judge present and the prosecutor and the police witnesses run the show. To the contrary, an Article 32 Hearing is conducted by a fiercely neutral commissioned military officer (frequently a JAG Officer) who follows limited rules of evidence and permits wide latitude on cross-examination of witnesses against the accused.

I like the Article 32 process much better than the Grand Jury. It just feels better to me to keep everything out in the open with an accused having the right to counsel and to participate. Grand Jury indictments handed down in secret have always bothered me because doing business that way can lead to abuse. To illustrate this point, one need look no further than to the prosecutor who got a grand jury to indict those innocent Duke lacrosse players.

For more detail on the Article 32 Hearing, check out:
www.jag.navy.mil/html/NLSOGlakesArticle_32_investigations.htm

Story from the AJC here.

Maria Rivera sits in the Cobb County Jail, facing deportation after a traffic stop.

If the Mableton mother of three, who is here illegally from Mexico, had been pulled over in any other county in Georgia, she likely would have bailed out and gone on with her life.

But Cobb County’s jail is at the forefront of local enforcement of immigration laws, going a step further than many states and further than a new Georgia law requires.

Cobb has trained some sheriff’s deputies to determine the legal status of all foreign born inmates at the jail, no matter how minor the charge. Cobb jailers now can start deportation proceedings under what’s known as a “287-G” agreement with federal immigration authorities.

“The computers are up and running,” Cobb County Chief Deputy Sheriff Lynda Coker said. “They can run inquiries on a federal database.”

A new state law effective July 1 requires jailers statewide to determine the legal status of inmates charged with felonies or DUI and report illegal immigrants to federal immigration officials, but they can leave it at that.

In Cobb, jailers have been trained by federal immigration officials on how to inspect immigration documents.

“They can initiate the removal proceedings themselves,” said Richard Rocha, a spokesman for U.S. Immigration and Customs and Enforcement, known as ICE. “Any time we can share resources with local law enforcement, it’s a plus for public safety,” Rocha said.

Proceedings against 42

In the four weeks since the program began, Cobb jailers and ICE have interviewed 86 inmates, placed immigration holds on 68 and started deportation proceedings against 42, Coker said. Deportation paperwork done by sheriff’s deputies must be reviewed by an immigration officer before it goes to a judge.

Although it’s sheriff’s deputies, and not Cobb County Police Department officers, who are now processing deportation paperwork, the program is sending a shiver through the immigrant community.

Fear destroys any rapport the community had with police, said Jerry Gonzalez, head of the Georgia Association of Latino Elected Officials.

“This is having a very negative effect on overall public safety,” Gonzalez said.

Muzaffar Chishti, director of the Migration Policy Institute’s office at New York University Law School, agrees. The institute is a nonprofit Washington think tank that studies global migration patterns.

“People are reluctant to report crimes to the police, or be witnesses in criminal proceedings,” Chishti said.

As for the agreement’s effect on immigration patterns, it’s hard to say. Since 2001, there’s been an annual net increase of 500,000 illegal immigrants entering the country, Muzaffar said.

“There’s no evidence these agreements have led to a decrease in illegal immigration,” he said.

Coker stresses that Cobb jailers have had a cooperative relationship with immigration authorities for about 10 years and have reported illegal immigrants to them. What is happening in Cobb now, Coker said, is not much different, except sheriff’s deputies can now pitch in on the paperwork.

Some Cobb inmates who have been flagged for immigration holds are charged with child molestation or drugs, weapons and alcohol-related offenses, Rocha said.

“With the success of the program, we’ve been able to identify people who may otherwise not have been flagged,” he said.

Nationwide since 2006, local jailers have identified more than 20,000 illegal immigrants through cooperative agreements with the federal government like Cobb’s, Rocha said.

Whether and how an inmate is flagged as illegal may differ in each case as it goes through the system. Some jails have dedicated ICE officers to identify illegal immigrants as they are booked. At others, ICE relies on local jailers to notify them if an inmate may be here illegally, Rocha said.

Inmates collected by ICE right away are usually those facing lesser charges, Coker said. Those with more serious charges usually go to trial and serve time if convicted, she said. It’s up to ICE to deport them after they serve their time.

Traffic violations

Rivera was flagged because she had been deported before, in March 2006, after crossing the Mexican border illegally, Rocha said.

Rivera crossed again last year and went to Chicago with her husband and three children, said Enrique Farias, her roommate. About six months ago she came to Mableton with her children, Farias said.

His sister cared for the three children a few weeks while their mother was in jail, he said, until an uncle from Chicago came last week took the children home with him.

Rivera was stopped by a Cobb County police officer July 11 on her way to work as a house cleaner, Farias said. She is charged with driving without a license, having no proof of insurance and an expired tag, according to jail records.

Cobb County police Chief George Hatfield said his officer had no choice but to enforce the law with Rivera.

“It’s sad if she’s got the three children and everything, but she should have thought about that before she got behind the wheel of a car,” he said.

Below is a story from the Associated Press.

David McDade has handed out some 35 copies of a video of teenagers having sex at a party.

McDade is no porno kingpin, but a district attorney. And he says Georgia’s open-records law leaves him no choice but to release the footage because it was evidence in one of the state’s most turbulent cases — that of Genarlow Wilson, a young man serving 10 years in prison for having oral sex with a girl when they were teenagers.

McDade’s actions have opened him up to accusations that he is vindictively misusing his authority to keep Wilson behind bars — and worse, distributing child pornography.

“This has been a ferocious, vindictive prosecution of Genarlow Wilson,” said state Sen. Vincent Fort, an Atlanta Democrat. “What is going on is a vendetta.”

McDade, who is district attorney in Douglas County, in suburban Atlanta, did not immediately return calls Thursday.

He has said that while the law required him to release the video, he also believes the footage helps his case — by showing that Wilson is not the squeaky-clean football star and honor student portrayed by his supporters.

“Most of those who do not want people to see the tape know that it’s damning to their position,” McDade told The Associated Press.

He released the video after receiving an open records request from the AP, and said he has given it to about three dozen people, including reporters, lawmakers and several members of the public who requested it.

It shows Wilson, then 17, receiving oral sex from a 15-year-old girl and having intercourse with another 17-year-old girl. It was shot at a 2003 New Year’s Eve Party at a hotel room by another partygoer.

Earlier this week, Georgia’s chief federal prosecutor, U.S. Attorney David Nahmias, said the video “constitutes child pornography under federal law,” and he called on McDade’s office to stop releasing copies.

“These laws are intended to protect the children depicted in such images from the ongoing victimization of having their sexual activity viewed by others,” Nahmias said.

Nahmias’ office refused to say whether he would bring criminal charges against the D.A.

Critics say that at the very least, McDade should have obscured the faces of the underage girls to conceal their identity, or sought a protective order to keep the material under seal.

Such steps are common in sex abuses cases, especially those involving underage victims, said Diane Moyer, legal director for the Pennsylvania-based National Sexual Violence Research Center.

“The bottom line is we need to have respect for the victims in these kinds of cases,” Moyer said. “To release this kind of thing, to me it’s prurient and it takes the open records law too far.”

Several Wilson supporters likened McDade to disgraced Duke lacrosse prosecutor Mike Nifong and called on Georgia’s attorney general to investigate.

“Mike Nifong lost his license, and if he lost his license, then certainly a district attorney that distributes child pornography ought to be investigated,” the Rev. Raphael Warnock, pastor of Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, said Thursday.

State Sen. Emanuel Jones said he would introduce legislation to block district attorneys from handing over photographic images in sex cases.

“I’m going to call it the David McDade Act,” Jones said. “Sometimes we have to protect our kids from district attorneys.”

Wilson was convicted of aggravated child molestation for having oral sex with the 15-year-old girl. He has served more than two years of a mandatory 10-year sentence.

The law Wilson was convicted of breaking made consensual oral sex between teens a felony. It has since been changed by the Georgia Legislature. But the state’s courts have held that the new law cannot be applied retroactively.

A judge last month called Wilson’s sentence “a grave miscarriage of justice” and ordered him set free. But prosecutors are trying to block his release. The Georgia Supreme Court is set to hear the case next week.

McDade fought a bill in the Legislature earlier this year that would have helped Wilson. Some lawmakers who were on the fence changed their mind after seeing the tape.

A simple battery wouldn’t normally be news around here, but the media is still fascinated by John Mark Karr.  He is the man that falsely confessed to the killing of Jon Benet Ramsey.  Read the story here from Yahoo.

http://www.mdjonline.com/articles/2007/06/06/268/10261150.prt

You can’t really have a blog dedicated to criminal defense work and not mention the Duke “rape” case today.  As everyone with a radio or television knows, the charges against these young men were dismissed today.  There lives however have been changed forever.  So has the life of the District Attorney that rode this case to his re-election.  He now has the Bar Association to deal with and may get disbarred.  The Attorney General would not rule out criminal charges against Nifong.

For those of you that would like a very thorough discussion of this case, check out this blog.

I hope this case helps the public understand how easy it is to get charged with a crime in this day and age.  I hope the criminal defense bar will let this case inspire them to keep up the good fight.

I love this quote from one of the young men, Reade Seligmann,

“This entire experience has opened my eyes up to a tragic world of injustice I never knew existed. If it is possible for law enforcement officials to systematically railroad us with no evidence whatsoever, it is frightening to think what they could do to those who do not to have the resources to defend themselves. So rather than relying on disparaging stereotypes, or creating political and racial conflicts, we must all take a step back from this case and learn from it. This tragedy has revealed that our society has lost site of the core principle of our legal system, the presumption of innocence.”

Bond Reduced For Accused ‘Barbie Bandit’ - News

Heather Johnston’s bond was reduced to $10,000.00 for the theft in which she was involved. She was also ordered to live with her parents and obey a strict cerfew.  Apparantly, after the high-profile theft, they gave some money to the homeless.

House Bill 185 introduced by Rep. Barry Fleming is an attempt to re-write Georgia’s long standing and deeply-rooted law of requiring unanimous verdicts.  Interestingly, it seeks to rewrite the law where unanimous verdicts are needed the most, Death Penalty cases.  How in the world is in that we would require a unanimous verdict to convict someone of a minor misdemeanor, but 9 out of 12 would be OK to sentence a defendant to death?

This news comes on the heels of Willie Williams release from prison last week after being exonerated by DNA evidence.  He spent the last 21 years of his life in prison for a crime he didn’t commit.  It was the sixth time in seven years that DNA has cleared an inmate in Georgia.  This is an issue not limited to Georgia, it is happening all over the country, prompting many states to modify the procedures used in police line-ups and raising awareness on the fallability of eyewitness evidence.

For more, read these two articles here and here in the Marietta Daily Journal.

The shooting of an elderly lady in Atlanta takes a disgusting turn. This from the AJC.
An Atlanta police narcotics officer has told federal investigators at least one member of his unit lied about making a drug buy at the home of an elderly woman killed in a subsequent raid, according to a person close to the investigation.

In an affidavit to get a search warrant at the home Nov. 21, narcotics officer Jason R. Smith told a magistrate he and Officer Arthur Tesler had a confidential informant buy $50 worth of crack at 933 Neal St. from a man named “Sam.”

But narcotics officer Gregg Junnier, who was wounded in the shootout, has since told federal investigators that did not happen, according to the person close to the investigation. Police got a no-knock warrant after claiming that “Sam” had surveillance cameras outside the Neal Street residence and they needed the element of surprise to capture him and the drugs.

The resident at the home, Kathryn Johnston, who is reported to be either 88 or 92, was startled by the sound of her burglar-bar door being battered in, and she fired her revolver at the officers. She was killed and three officers were wounded by gunfire or shrapnel.

Buddy Parker, a former federal prosecutor, said that officers who lied to the magistrate could face serious charges in addition to making false statements to a judge.

“If that was the case, you have a conspiracy,” said Parker. “If you have a warrantless entry, you have no legal investigation. It can be either conscious disregard for the law and all conduct flowing from that is criminal — the entry, the homicide. It’s no different from people going in to rob a bank and kill someone in a shooting.”

U.S Attorney David Nahmias declined to comment on whether Junnier was cooperating in the investigation.

Rand Csehy, attorney for Junnier, an 18-year police veteran who retired last week, would only say his client has cooperated.

Tesler’s attorney, Bill McKenney, would only say, “My guy has told the truth.” But the attorney would not say whom Tesler has spoken with or what he said.

Smith’s attorney, Ed Garland, did not return phone calls.

All eight officers on the narcotics team were placed on paid leave pending the investigation by federal, state and Fulton County authorities.

Junnier has told investigators the arrest of a suspected small-time dealer named Fabian Sheats that afternoon set the fatal set of circumstances in motion. According to police reports, Sheats, who was arrested for the third time in four months, told police that he had seen a kilogram of cocaine at the Neal Street home earlier that day.

A relative of Sheats said Wednesday he is being held in jail as a government witness,

The narcotics team tried to contact Alex White, who has worked as a confidential informant, to buy drugs at the house but was unable to get him to come quickly, the person told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. “But they rushed it” and went to the magistrate, telling the judge the story about an informant buying the drugs, said the person close to the investigation.

Alex White came forward to authorities a day after the shooting, saying narcotics officers were trying to tell him to lie and say he bought drugs at the house. White came to light after he jumped out of an Atlanta squad car Nov. 22 and called 911.

On a 911 tape, an insistent and anxious-sounding man identifying himself as White told an operator, “I have two cops chasing me. They’re on the dirty side, two undercover officers.”

Later, White, who acknowledged having worked as a confidential informant, told WAGA the cops told him “you need to cover our [rear]. . . . It’s all on you man. . . . You need to tell them about this Sam dude.” According to the WAGA report, the informant said Sam didn’t exist and he never went to the house. Speaking Wednesday night at a town hall meeting where dozens of speakers railed against the police action in the Johnston shooting, State Sen. Vincent Fort (D-Atlanta) said he plans to introduce legislation to stiffen the requirements for no-knock warrants.

“I’m outraged,” Fort said, “about how things went down on Nov. 21.”

Staff writer Jeffry Scott contributed to this article.

Man ordered to wear “sex offender” T-shirt | Oddly Enough | Reuters.com

It was only a matter of time!  $100.00 says within 2 years a bill gets introduced in our legislature requiring this as a punishment for sex offenders.